
Thomas W.
Webmaster
avlv@hotmail.de
Nov 21, 2008, 6:00 PM
Post #15 of 42
(13 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: Congratulations to Jon Stewart!
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:44:08 -0800 (PST), salmoneous@aol.com wrote: >On Nov 21, 4:29 pm, Thomas W. <a...@hotmail.de> wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:19:43 -0800 (PST), salmone...@aol.com wrote: >> >> I see it the same way. But in any case, it's going to be very >> >> entertaining to see him and Hillary duke it out. If he's able to >> >> control her, I'll be very impressed. >> >> >> Thomas >> >> >You seem to think Hillary will fight with the president and be nearly >> >impossible to control. Why? >> >> That's putting it strongly. I think it's a good choice, but that it >> might lead to trouble because of Mrs. Clinton obvious strong ego > >Everybody at this level has an obvious strong ego. Why single out >Hillary? > >> If there's trouble, there might be lots of it.' > >Other than her last name being "Clinton" (which seems to drive some >people bonkers) what makes you expect trouble? Why single out Hillary >for the possibility of trouble? I'd think that was obvious: she was his main opponent for the nomination? *I* 'd certainly be a bit bitter. > >> Firing >> her at some point seems a pretty problematic option. > >Sheesh, she hasn't even been announced and you are already talking >about the problems with her being fired? Why single out Hillary for >this sort of speculation? I'd probably single out anyone who was Obama's last serious rival for the nomination. > >Not trying to pick on you Thomas, but this insane "worry about >Hillary" meme in drving me bonkers. Remember, I'm from SLOE: the people over here actually thought Clinton was a great president. In my country, a woman holds the most important political post and I vote for her. I think the right guy won - the nomination and the election. But you've had a lot worse choices than these three in the past. Thomas
|